Several candidates contesting the upcoming Panchayat elections in Assam’s Lahorighat constituency have revealed concerning gaps in their understanding of basic political knowledge, causing widespread alarm among voters and political observers. The disclosures came during public interactions and training sessions meant to prepare candidates for their responsibilities if elected. Many struggled to name the Chief Minister of Assam, while others faltered when asked about fundamental duties of a Panchayat member.
The developments have sparked a wave of criticism across party lines and from civil society, with many questioning the candidate selection processes. Locals who attended recent campaign events expressed disbelief at how some aspirants failed to answer elementary questions about governance. The issue has cast a shadow over the effectiveness of Panchayati Raj institutions if individuals with limited awareness secure crucial administrative roles.
Observers believe that the situation points to deeper systemic issues within the political structure at the grassroots level. While political parties continue to promise better local governance, their endorsement of underprepared candidates reflects a disconnect between campaign narratives and leadership quality. Voters in Lahorighat and neighboring areas have begun voicing concerns, demanding greater accountability from parties in the nomination process.
The Election Commission’s district-level teams have also expressed concern. Officials who facilitated the training workshops reported that a significant number of participants struggled to grasp the importance of their roles. Some candidates reportedly asked for clarification on the basic functions of a village head or a block-level officer, despite having already filed their nominations.
Senior local administrators have initiated additional orientation programs to ensure that all contestants, regardless of their political affiliation, understand their civic duties and constitutional responsibilities. District officials emphasized the importance of informed leadership in delivering schemes related to healthcare, education, and rural development. They noted that Panchayat leaders play a vital role in implementing flagship programs such as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana.
Concerned residents and community elders in Lahorighat have urged the youth to participate more actively in the electoral process. They believe that new, educated voices could transform the political culture at the grassroots level. Several non-governmental organizations working in the region have also offered support through civic education workshops.
Political analysts believe that the trend of fielding candidates based on caste, community appeal, or loyalty to party workers—without considering competence—has severely weakened the quality of Panchayat-level governance in several regions. They argue that such decisions often lead to administrative delays, misuse of funds, and poor implementation of welfare schemes.
Local journalists covering the elections reported that social media platforms have amplified the criticism. Clips of candidates hesitating or fumbling during interviews have gone viral, prompting widespread ridicule and memes. However, some voices have urged compassion, suggesting that these candidates could perform well with proper support and training if given a chance.
Despite the controversy, political parties remain tight-lipped about any potential revisions to their candidate lists. Party spokespersons have emphasized their commitment to inclusive politics and argued that formal education should not be the sole criteria for leadership. However, they acknowledged that basic civic awareness remains essential for fulfilling administrative duties effectively.
As the campaign season intensifies, focus has shifted toward the need for comprehensive pre-election training for all grassroots aspirants. Government officials and election monitors are coordinating efforts to ensure that all candidates receive sufficient exposure to legal responsibilities, governance frameworks, and community engagement practices.
With polling day approaching, the spotlight remains firmly on Lahorighat and similar constituencies. Voters are now evaluating not just party symbols but also the readiness of individual candidates to serve their communities responsibly. The unfolding situation has served as a wake-up call, highlighting the urgent need to balance political representation with preparedness and competence at the foundation of democracy.
The revelations from Lahorighat have also stirred discussions within academic circles, especially among educators and scholars who have long advocated for the integration of civic education in schools. Several college professors from Barpeta and Morigaon districts noted that the lack of basic political awareness among candidates reflects a larger failure in promoting civic consciousness at the grassroots level. They emphasized that early exposure to the Panchayati Raj system, constitution, and governance models in school curricula could help cultivate a better-informed generation of future leaders.
Retired government officials who once served in Panchayat roles have also weighed in, sharing that during their tenure, they often dealt with local representatives who lacked basic procedural knowledge. However, they added that the scale of ignorance witnessed this time is unprecedented and calls for urgent corrective measures. Some suggested that the state government should make it mandatory for aspiring Panchayat candidates to pass a basic qualifying test before contesting elections. They believe such a step would enhance governance and reduce administrative burdens on bureaucrats who must spend extra time guiding underprepared representatives.
Meanwhile, local youth forums and women’s collectives have started organizing informal mock sessions and awareness meetings with candidates. These initiatives aim to educate contestants about critical subjects like sanitation projects, school management committees, local dispute resolution mechanisms, and resource allocation. Organizers of these community-driven workshops believe that an informed candidate, regardless of formal education, can bring meaningful change if equipped with the right tools and knowledge.
Cultural leaders and poets in the region have also turned their attention to the issue, incorporating the theme into their folk performances and compositions. In a recent Bhawaiya music event, performers humorously addressed the state of local politics, urging the audience to elect not just a familiar face but a candidate who understands people’s problems and policies. This artistic intervention reflects how the issue has permeated daily discourse and entered public consciousness.
Despite the embarrassment, some candidates themselves have responded with humility and openness. A few publicly acknowledged their knowledge gaps and pledged to educate themselves before taking office. They said they welcomed criticism as an opportunity to grow and prove their dedication through action rather than rhetoric. These gestures have earned them some respect among the electorate, with residents noting the importance of honesty and a willingness to learn in public servants.
As election fever grips Assam’s rural belts, the Lahorighat episode stands as a critical moment of introspection. It underlines the need for a political culture where capacity-building precedes candidacy and where the future of rural governance is entrusted to leaders who possess not just popularity but also preparedness.