Former Congress leader Acharya Pramod Krishnam has issued a legal notice to the makers of the film Kalki 2898 AD, including Bollywood icon Amitabh Bachchan and South Indian star Prabhas. The notice, sent on Saturday, accuses the film of offending Hindu religious sentiments.
Acharya Pramod Krishnam claims that Kalki 2898 AD, a dystopian sci-fi movie, has hurt the religious feelings of Hindus. In his statement, Krishnam emphasized the deep emotional and spiritual connections that Hindus have with their religious beliefs. He argued that the film tampered with the values of Sanatana Dharma, which he asserts should remain unaltered.
The central figure in question is Lord Kalki Narayan, who holds significant importance in Hinduism as the prophesied final incarnation of Lord Vishnu. According to Krishnam, the Puranas describe Lord Kalki’s arrival, which has profound spiritual and cultural implications for devotees. He referenced the recent inauguration of the Shri Kalki Dham by Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a symbol of the ongoing reverence for this deity.
Krishnam’s legal notice demands a response from the producers and actors involved in the film. He insists that the portrayal of religious figures and concepts in the film is not only insensitive but also disrespectful to the deeply held beliefs of millions of Hindus. The legal action underscores a broader sensitivity and ongoing debates regarding the representation of religious themes in popular media.
The producers of Kalki 2898 AD and the actors have yet to respond to the legal notice. As the situation develops, it may spark further discussions about the intersection of religious sentiments and creative expression in Indian cinema.
This incident highlights the delicate balance that filmmakers must navigate when incorporating religious and cultural elements into their work, especially in a diverse country where such portrayals can elicit strong reactions.
Former Congress leader Acharya Pramod Krishnam has issued a legal notice to the makers of the film Kalki 2898 AD, including Bollywood icon Amitabh Bachchan and South Indian star Prabhas. The notice, sent on Saturday, accuses the film of offending Hindu religious sentiments.
Acharya Pramod Krishnam claims that Kalki 2898 AD, a dystopian sci-fi movie, has hurt the religious feelings of Hindus. In his statement, Krishnam emphasized the deep emotional and spiritual connections that Hindus have with their religious beliefs. He argued that the film tampered with the values of Sanatana Dharma, which he asserts should remain unaltered.
The central figure in question is Lord Kalki Narayan, who holds significant importance in Hinduism as the prophesied final incarnation of Lord Vishnu. According to Krishnam, the Puranas describe Lord Kalki’s arrival, which has profound spiritual and cultural implications for devotees. He referenced the recent inauguration of the Shri Kalki Dham by Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a symbol of the ongoing reverence for this deity.
Krishnam’s legal notice demands a response from the producers and actors involved in the film. He insists that the portrayal of religious figures and concepts in the film is not only insensitive but also disrespectful to the deeply held beliefs of millions of Hindus. The legal action underscores a broader sensitivity and ongoing debates regarding the representation of religious themes in popular media.
The producers of Kalki 2898 AD and the actors have yet to respond to the legal notice. As the situation develops, it may spark further discussions about the intersection of religious sentiments and creative expression in Indian cinema.
The film’s depiction of Lord Kalki and its narrative choices have already sparked debates among viewers and critics alike. The controversy sheds light on the fine line filmmakers must tread when exploring religious and mythological themes. The outcome of this legal challenge could influence how future films approach sensitive cultural and spiritual subjects.
This incident highlights the delicate balance that filmmakers must navigate when incorporating religious and cultural elements into their work, especially in a diverse country where such portrayals can elicit strong reactions. The film’s response and any subsequent legal proceedings will likely be closely watched by both the entertainment industry and religious communities.