In a recent ruling, the Calcutta High Court overturned a lower court’s judgement that had fined a hotel executive Rs 10 lakh for allegedly “cheating” his live-in partner by breaking his promise of marriage. The High Court ruled that entering into a live-in relationship after disclosing one’s marital status and parenthood cannot be considered deception.
This ruling is significant as it clarifies the legal position on live-in relationships in India. Currently, India does not have a specific law that regulates live-in relationships, and courts have often relied on traditional notions of marriage and morality to adjudicate such cases. In this context, the High Court’s ruling is a departure from the conventional understanding of live-in relationships as being akin to “promiscuity” or “adultery”.
The High Court’s decision is in line with a growing trend in India towards recognizing live-in relationships as valid forms of companionship. While live-in relationships were once viewed with suspicion and disapproval, they are increasingly being seen as an alternative to marriage, particularly among younger, urban populations.
However, it is important to note that the High Court’s ruling does not provide blanket protection to individuals who enter into live-in relationships. Partners in such relationships still have certain legal obligations towards each other, and disputes can arise over issues such as property rights, maintenance, and custody of children.
Overall, the Calcutta High Court’s decision is a welcome development in the legal recognition of live-in relationships in India. It sends a clear message that individuals have the right to make their own choices about their relationships, and that they should not be punished for doing so. At the same time, the ruling underscores the need for a comprehensive legal framework that recognizes the rights and obligations of partners in live-in relationships.