AIUDF chief Badruddin Ajmal has distanced his party from the controversial remarks made by Dhing MLA Aminul Islam, who was arrested earlier today. The remarks in question, which linked the recent terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam area to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah, sparked widespread outrage across political circles and drew strong condemnation from national leaders.
Ajmal, addressing the media in Guwahati, clarified that the All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) neither supports nor endorses the statements made by Islam. He stated firmly that Islam’s views were personal and did not reflect the ideology or stance of the party. “The AIUDF strongly condemns any statement that questions the integrity of the country or its democratic institutions,” Ajmal said, attempting to control the damage caused by the incident.
Police arrested Aminul Islam earlier this morning after he made comments suggesting that the Union government could have had a role in the Pahalgam attack. The attack, which claimed the lives of multiple security personnel, shocked the nation and led to an outpouring of grief. In a video that circulated online, Islam appeared to question the timing of the attack and insinuated a larger political motive behind it, hinting at the central leadership’s involvement.
Law enforcement agencies registered a case against Islam under sections related to promoting enmity between groups and making provocative statements. His arrest took place amid tight security in Nagaon district, where he represents the Dhing constituency. Following the arrest, protests erupted in pockets of the region, with Islam’s supporters demanding his immediate release. Authorities maintained a strict vigil to prevent escalation.
Ajmal reiterated that the party holds national security and unity as top priorities. He expressed concern over the timing and nature of Islam’s statements, especially when tensions are already high in the Valley following the attack. Ajmal said he had no prior knowledge of the remarks and came to know about them through media reports and social media posts.
Political observers noted that Ajmal’s swift distancing from the comments signals a clear attempt to preserve the AIUDF’s image ahead of the upcoming elections. The party has been trying to broaden its appeal in Assam and other northeastern states. With this controversy threatening to derail those efforts, Ajmal acted quickly to limit the fallout.
The AIUDF chief also said that his party respects all communities and believes in peaceful coexistence. He added that the party has always stood against terrorism in any form and has never indulged in communal or divisive rhetoric. While answering questions from journalists, Ajmal hinted that the party may take disciplinary action against Islam once legal proceedings are complete.
Meanwhile, BJP leaders in Assam and Delhi wasted no time in attacking the AIUDF over the issue. They accused the party of harboring individuals with “anti-national” mindsets. Assam BJP president Bhabesh Kalita demanded that the AIUDF suspend Islam and issue an unconditional apology to the people of the country.
Congress leaders also expressed disapproval of Islam’s remarks, although they refrained from attacking the AIUDF directly. A senior Congress MLA from Assam said that public representatives must exercise caution and responsibility, especially during volatile times.
Islam’s legal team has approached the court for bail, and a hearing is expected in the coming days. His arrest has reignited debate about freedom of speech versus national interest, with several civil rights groups calling for a balanced and fair approach.
As the controversy unfolds, political temperatures in Assam remain high. Ajmal’s statement may help defuse some of the tension, but the larger implications of the episode will likely play out in the days ahead. The incident has already drawn national attention, and both ruling and opposition parties continue to watch the situation closely.
AIUDF chief Badruddin Ajmal has distanced his party from the controversial remarks made by Dhing MLA Aminul Islam, who was arrested earlier today. The remarks in question, which linked the recent terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam area to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah, sparked widespread outrage across political circles and drew strong condemnation from national leaders.
Ajmal, addressing the media in Guwahati, clarified that the All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) neither supports nor endorses the statements made by Islam. He stated firmly that Islam’s views were personal and did not reflect the ideology or stance of the party. “The AIUDF strongly condemns any statement that questions the integrity of the country or its democratic institutions,” Ajmal said, attempting to control the damage caused by the incident.
Police arrested Aminul Islam earlier this morning after he made comments suggesting that the Union government could have had a role in the Pahalgam attack. The attack, which claimed the lives of multiple security personnel, shocked the nation and led to an outpouring of grief. In a video that circulated online, Islam appeared to question the timing of the attack and insinuated a larger political motive behind it, hinting at the central leadership’s involvement.
Law enforcement agencies registered a case against Islam under sections related to promoting enmity between groups and making provocative statements. His arrest took place amid tight security in Nagaon district, where he represents the Dhing constituency. Following the arrest, protests erupted in pockets of the region, with Islam’s supporters demanding his immediate release. Authorities maintained a strict vigil to prevent escalation.
Ajmal reiterated that the party holds national security and unity as top priorities. He expressed concern over the timing and nature of Islam’s statements, especially when tensions are already high in the Valley following the attack. Ajmal said he had no prior knowledge of the remarks and came to know about them through media reports and social media posts.
Political observers noted that Ajmal’s swift distancing from the comments signals a clear attempt to preserve the AIUDF’s image ahead of the upcoming elections. The party has been trying to broaden its appeal in Assam and other northeastern states. With this controversy threatening to derail those efforts, Ajmal acted quickly to limit the fallout.
The AIUDF chief also said that his party respects all communities and believes in peaceful coexistence. He added that the party has always stood against terrorism in any form and has never indulged in communal or divisive rhetoric. While answering questions from journalists, Ajmal hinted that the party may take disciplinary action against Islam once legal proceedings are complete.
Meanwhile, BJP leaders in Assam and Delhi wasted no time in attacking the AIUDF over the issue. They accused the party of harboring individuals with “anti-national” mindsets. Assam BJP president Bhabesh Kalita demanded that the AIUDF suspend Islam and issue an unconditional apology to the people of the country.
Congress leaders also expressed disapproval of Islam’s remarks, although they refrained from attacking the AIUDF directly. A senior Congress MLA from Assam said that public representatives must exercise caution and responsibility, especially during volatile times. The Congress leader further emphasized the need for leaders to avoid making statements that could inflame communal sentiments or jeopardize national security.
Islam’s legal team has approached the court for bail, and a hearing is expected in the coming days. His arrest has reignited debate about freedom of speech versus national interest, with several civil rights groups calling for a balanced and fair approach. They stress that while freedom of speech is a fundamental right, statements that promote hatred or endanger public peace should be dealt with firmly.
The AIUDF’s reaction to the controversy also comes at a critical time, as Assam heads into the next phase of political campaigns. The party’s swift disavowal of Islam’s comments may help them manage their image in the face of mounting criticism, but it also raises questions about internal discipline within the party. The opposition parties are likely to keep the pressure on AIUDF to prove that such controversial opinions do not find a place within their ranks.https://boroktimes.com/tripura-cm-emphasizes-timely-completion-of-projects-to-improve-public-welfare/