A coalition of church bodies in Arunachal Pradesh has launched a hunger strike to voice their strong opposition to the state’s Freedom of Religion Act, 1978. The protest, led by the Arunachal Pradesh Christian Forum (APCF), aims to pressure the government into repealing the controversial law, which they claim infringes on their constitutional rights to religious freedom.
Key Reasons Behind the Protest
The hunger strike, which began in the state capital, Itanagar, is the latest in a series of demonstrations against the Freedom of Religion Act. Church leaders argue that the law, initially introduced to curb forced conversions, is now being misused to target Christian communities and other religious minorities.
The APCF and its allies believe that the legislation fosters an atmosphere of distrust and intolerance, hindering the peaceful coexistence of diverse faiths in the region. They assert that the Act is redundant, as existing laws adequately address coercion and fraudulent practices.
Understanding the Freedom of Religion Act, 1978
The Arunachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act was enacted to prohibit conversion from one religion to another through force, inducement, or fraudulent means. It requires individuals to inform district authorities before changing their religion. Violations can lead to fines and imprisonment.
While the law’s supporters claim it safeguards indigenous cultures and prevents exploitative conversions, critics argue that it is selectively enforced, disproportionately affecting Christians and other religious minorities.
Voices from the Ground
Rev. Tarun Tayang, the President of APCF, emphasized that the hunger strike represents the frustration felt by Christian communities across the state. “We are not against the government or our tribal customs. We are standing up for our fundamental right to practice our faith without fear,” he stated.
Protesters have gathered outside the Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat, holding placards that read “Faith is Personal” and “Repeal the Freedom of Religion Act.” The peaceful demonstration has drawn support from various civil society groups and human rights organizations.
Government’s Stance
The state government, led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has maintained that the Freedom of Religion Act is necessary to preserve the indigenous heritage and prevent unethical conversion practices. Chief Minister Pema Khandu has previously acknowledged concerns but stressed that the law was enacted with the region’s cultural sensitivities in mind.
However, the hunger strike has intensified calls for a reassessment of the legislation. Opposition parties, including the Congress, have urged the government to engage in dialogue with religious leaders to address their grievances.
Broader Implications
The protest in Arunachal Pradesh highlights the ongoing tensions in India over religious freedom and anti-conversion laws. Similar legislation exists in other states, including Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, and Gujarat. Critics argue that these laws often embolden vigilante groups and fuel religious polarization.
Legal experts point out that the Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the right to propagate one’s faith under Article 25 of the Constitution. Any restrictions on this right must pass the test of reasonableness and should not infringe upon individual liberties.
Support and Solidarity
The hunger strike has received solidarity messages from Christian organizations across India, as well as international human rights bodies. They view the movement as part of a larger struggle to protect religious freedom in the country.
Fr. Felix Anthony, a spokesperson for the North East India Christian Council, emphasized the need for mutual respect and understanding. “Religious harmony is the cornerstone of our democratic society. Any law that undermines this harmony should be reconsidered,” he said.
Path Forward
The APCF has vowed to continue its peaceful resistance until the government initiates a formal review of the Freedom of Religion Act. They have also called for the formation of an independent committee to investigate alleged cases of harassment under the law.
As the hunger strike enters its next phase, all eyes are on the state government to see whether it will heed the calls for dialogue and reform. For now, the church leaders remain resolute, seeking not only legal change but also a reaffirmation of India’s commitment to religious pluralism.