Union Minister Kiren Rijiju addressed the controversy surrounding the midnight debate on the Manipur situation, emphasizing that the central government should not be held responsible for the timing of the discussion. Rijiju’s remarks come amid growing criticism from opposition parties and civil society groups who have questioned the government’s handling of the Manipur crisis and the scheduling of the parliamentary debate.
Background of the Controversy
The Manipur crisis has been a focal point of national discourse, with various stakeholders expressing concern over the state’s political and social unrest. The decision to hold a parliamentary debate on the issue at midnight sparked outrage among opposition members, who viewed the timing as an attempt to downplay the severity of the situation and limit public engagement.
Rijiju’s Clarification
Addressing the media, Rijiju clarified that the scheduling of parliamentary debates is determined by procedural necessities and not by any intent to suppress discussion. He stated that the central government remains committed to transparency and open dialogue, and that the timing of the debate should not be construed as an attempt to evade responsibility or scrutiny.
Opposition’s Response
Despite Rijiju’s assurances, opposition leaders have continued to criticize the government’s approach to the Manipur crisis. They argue that the midnight debate reflects a broader pattern of the central government avoiding accountability and failing to address the root causes of the unrest in Manipur. The opposition has called for more substantive engagement with the issues facing the state and greater involvement of local stakeholders in the resolution process.
Public Reaction
The public response to the midnight debate and Rijiju’s subsequent comments has been mixed. Some citizens have expressed understanding of the procedural constraints that may have led to the late-night scheduling, while others view it as indicative of a lack of seriousness in addressing the Manipur crisis. Civil society organizations have urged the government to prioritize transparency and inclusivity in its approach to resolving the situation.
Looking Ahead
As the debate over the Manipur crisis continues, Rijiju’s statement serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in parliamentary scheduling and the importance of clear communication from government officials. Moving forward, it will be crucial for the central government to engage constructively with all stakeholders, ensure that discussions are held at appropriate times to maximize public participation, and demonstrate a genuine commitment to resolving the challenges facing Manipur.