In the wake of the Myanmar drone strike that killed several ULFA-I militants, political and civil unrest is again rising in Assam. The families of the ULFA-I victims are reportedly facing harassment from the Assam police and Indian Army. This revelation has triggered a wave of criticism from various corners of society, with opposition leader Debabrata Saikia voicing strong condemnation.
Harassment of Assam ULFA-I Victims’ Families Reported
Multiple reports have surfaced stating that Assam ULFA-I victims’ families have been subjected to regular intimidation. Allegedly, these families received condolence messages and phone calls that were followed by questioning and surveillance by local authorities.
Political Reactions to ULFA-I Drone Strike Aftermath
Debabrata Saikia, the Leader of the Opposition, has brought this issue to the spotlight. He stated that the Assam police, in conjunction with military units, are targeting the ULFA-I victims’ families simply for receiving condolence messages. The political climate in Assam has turned more volatile due to these developments.
Military Response and Denial
While the Indian Army has denied allegations of harassment, civil society groups and human rights activists claim otherwise. They argue that the surveillance tactics amount to indirect punishment of the families who have already suffered the loss of loved ones.
Chief Minister’s Stance on ULFA-I Contact
What has added fuel to the fire is Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma’s past admission of being in contact with ULFA-I leader Paresh Baruah. Saikia questioned why the Chief Minister faces no scrutiny while grieving families are intimidated.
ULFA-I Drone Strike and Victim Profiles
The drone strike in Myanmar, allegedly carried out by Indian defense agencies, claimed the lives of several ULFA-I militants. Among the deceased were individuals from different regions of Assam, many of whom had joined the group due to local grievances. Their families are now at the center of a political and social storm.
Human Rights Perspective on Assam ULFA-I Victims’ Families
Human rights organizations have stepped in to document the claims of harassment. Amnesty International India and Human Rights Watch have been alerted about the situation. They emphasize that Assam ULFA-I victims’ families deserve compassion, not suspicion.
Legal Implications and Lack of FIRs
Interestingly, no formal FIRs (First Information Reports) have been filed against the ULFA-I victims’ families. This suggests that no criminal activity is being associated with them, yet the constant monitoring has created a climate of fear and distrust.
Calls for Judicial Inquiry
Opposition parties have demanded a judicial inquiry into the actions of Assam police and army units involved. Legal experts also insist that constitutional rights are being undermined in the name of national security.
Media Coverage and Public Sentiment
Several national and regional media outlets have started covering the issue. Public sentiment is divided—while some support strict measures against ULFA-I links, others believe that families should not be made scapegoats.
Impact on Children and Education
The impact on the children of Assam ULFA-I victims’ families has been devastating. In many cases, these children have stopped attending school due to fear and social ostracism. Educational NGOs have raised alarms over the psychological damage being inflicted.
Fear Among Local Communities
Entire communities are living under fear as authorities conduct late-night questioning and house visits. Villagers near Tinsukia, Sivasagar, and Dibrugarh have spoken to journalists about their experiences.
External Commentary on Assam Police Actions
International human rights commentators have condemned the intimidation of ULFA-I victims’ families. A recent report by The Hindu described the situation as a breakdown of civil liberties in conflict zones.
Community Protests in Assam
Small-scale protests have erupted across districts where ULFA-I militants hailed from. Community leaders are demanding assurances that family members of deceased individuals will not be persecuted for their relatives’ past actions.
Debabrata Saikia’s Continued Advocacy
Saikia continues to press the Assam government for transparency. He has also sought help from the central government to intervene and stop any unlawful practices against Assam ULFA-I victims’ families.
Government’s Silence Fuels Speculation
The state government has largely remained silent. This lack of response has only fueled more media speculation and public concern about the possible misuse of power.
Demand for Policy Change
Civil society groups are urging the government to issue a formal policy that separates counter-terrorism efforts from the treatment of deceased militants’ families. Such a policy could ensure that Assam ULFA-I victims’ families are not unfairly targeted.
ALSO READ : Devastating Assam Eviction Drive Hits 10,000+