The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and National Register of Citizens (NRC) have triggered nationwide debate in India. However, the response from the Northeast region—particularly Assam, Tripura, and Meghalaya—has been uniquely intense and rooted in historical, ethnic, and cultural sensitivities. For these states, the issue is not just about legality and religion but about identity, demography, and indigenous rights.
READ THIS ALSO: Assam to Resume Pushback Policy After SC Nod
What Is the CAA and NRC?
The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), 2019, aims to provide Indian citizenship to non-Muslim refugees from Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh who arrived before December 31, 2014. The NRC aims to identify undocumented migrants in India. While the CAA has a pan-India scope, the NRC was first implemented in Assam.
Why the Northeast Reacted Differently
For most Northeast states, the core fear is demographic and cultural dilution. Several indigenous communities, particularly in Assam and Tripura, believe that CAA directly threatens their ethnic identity by legalizing the presence of “foreigners,” especially Bengali-speaking Hindus.
Assam: The Epicenter of Resistance
Assam has a long and complex history with migration. The Assam Accord of 1985, signed after a six-year-long anti-immigrant movement, specified March 24, 1971, as the cutoff date for granting citizenship. The CAA overrides this, leading to mass protests, shutdowns, and widespread condemnation across the state in 2019–2020.
Even after five years, the resistance persists. Student bodies like AASU and artists’ groups continue to voice concerns. The fear of being outnumbered culturally and politically remains unresolved.
Tripura: A Demographic Shift Already Felt
Tripura’s tribal population has become a minority in their own land due to decades of migration. With CAA potentially regularizing even more immigrants, tribal groups have expressed concern over further marginalization. The Indigenous People’s Front of Tripura (IPFT) and other local bodies have opposed the Act, demanding constitutional safeguards.
Meghalaya: United by Religion, Divided by Ethnicity
Even though the Christian-majority state is exempt from the CAA due to its Sixth Schedule areas, protests erupted in 2019–2020 led by Khasi and Garo students. The fear was that non-tribal settlers might be legitimized through loopholes, threatening the region’s cultural fabric. Civil society remains watchful of any federal encroachment.
Central Government’s Response
The Union Government has repeatedly claimed that the CAA is humanitarian in nature and doesn’t affect existing citizens. However, in the Northeast, reassurance hasn’t translated into trust. Despite announcing that rules under CAA would be framed in 2024 and 2025, implementation remains stalled due to local resistance and legal challenges.
Present Scenario (2025)
In July 2025, the central government has refrained from launching any new NRC drives outside Assam. The Supreme Court continues to hear multiple petitions related to the constitutionality of the CAA. Meanwhile, local governments in Meghalaya and Tripura have passed resolutions urging further clarification or repeal of the law.
The Northeast’s resistance has also found national resonance. Protests by tribal groups and indigenous activists have become part of a broader civil rights movement questioning both the intent and the impact of citizenship-based exclusions.
Read more : Government Begins Issuing Citizenship Certificates Under CAA in West Bengal Amidst Controversy