Nagaland staff demand transparent IAS induction

0
Nagaland employees' bodies appeal for transparency in IAS induction, cite violation of merit-based norms

In the state of Nagaland, a coalition of government employee associations has raised serious concerns over the latest induction of officers into the Indian Administrative Service (IAS). The group argues that the process lacks clarity and has deviated from merit-based norms, calling for a fully transparent IAS induction moving forward.

The core of the dispute lies in the recent vacancy circular intended to bring in officers under the Non-State Civil Service (Non-SCS) quota. Employee bodies claim that the original circular, dated March 10 2025, contained a clear requirement: only officers recruited through the Nagaland Public Service Commission (NPSC) should be eligible for the IAS induction. They say that this requirement upheld fairness, transparency and merit. Shortly after the deadline for applications, the state government withdrew that circular and issued a revised one which, according to the associations, effectively opened the door to officers who did not enter service via the NPSC. They regard this as a violation of the principles of a transparent IAS induction.

Read More: Tripura Launches Food Support Scheme for TB Patients

The associations, including the Confederation of All Nagaland State Service Employees’ Association (CANSSEA), the Federation of Nagaland State Engineering Service Association (FONSESA), the Nagaland Secretariat Service Association (NSSA) and the Nagaland Finance & Accounts Service Association (NF&ASA) have declared that the altered process undermines both equal opportunity and merit. They argue that the transparent IAS induction process has been compromised whenever appointments bypass the public-service examination route.

They note that the withdrawal of the original circular came just a day after the application window closed and that the revised version was published without fresh applications from eligible candidates. The associations say this sequence of events raises the appearance of favouritism and bypassing of standard rules. They insist that this matter is not only about administrative procedure but also about protecting the integrity of the civil service and ensuring that young entrants see a fair and level playing field.

The employees’ groups have launched several protest actions to press their demands. Starting by wearing black ribbons at offices to symbolise dissent, they have moved on to poster campaigns across government departments. They say these steps reflect deep frustration at what they see as procedural opacity in the induction process. Their demand remains clear: restoration of the March 10 2025 circular in full, exclusion of any candidate inducted via irregular means, and adoption of a fully merit-based, transparent IAS induction process.

According to the joint statement by the associations, the transparent IAS induction must adhere to constitutional safeguards. The groups reference the Office Memorandum issued by the Department of Personnel & Training (DoPT) on October 7 2020, which clarifies that appointments not made through sanctioned posts or without proper qualifications are considered irregular and cannot feed into IAS induction. They lament that sidelining such criteria erodes trust in public institutions.

The associations warn that failure to adhere to transparent IAS induction standards could have multiple long-term consequences. First, they say it will demoralise officers who entered via proper competitive exams. Second, it risks promoting a culture of patronage rather than performance. Third, public confidence in state institutions may suffer if posts are seen as secured by connections rather than merit.

Meanwhile, the state government has so far issued limited comment. Officials acknowledge the existence of employee concerns but stress that the new circular was issued to align with broader guidelines and to ensure the state did not lose quota opportunities for IAS induction. They argue that flexibility was required to interpret rules given the unique service structure of Nagaland and that no candidate has yet been officially inducted until all procedural steps are completed.

Observers highlight that the transparency of the process is under scrutiny. They emphasise that when a selection pathway changes abruptly, especially in high-stakes postings such as IAS induction, stakeholders need full disclosure of criteria, scoring, candidate lists and decision processes to maintain trust. The employees’ associations believe that without such openness, the transparent IAS induction mantra becomes hollow.

Local civil society voices have also weighed in, urging that any reform of service induction must respect both local context and national standards. They point out that Nagaland’s smaller size and distinctive service architecture make clarity even more important. They argue that transparent IAS induction is central not only to fairness for state officers but also to ensuring that administrative leadership remains credible and effective.

The controversy has deepened to the point where the associations have threatened to escalate their protest if demands are not met. A pen-down strike has been announced, to continue until the state government restores the original circular and re-examines the select list based on merit-only eligible candidates. Meanwhile they have committed to keeping essential services running and not disrupting public welfare functions.

For the youth aiming to join the state services, the movement signals a warning: today’s appointment pathways set the standard for tomorrow’s careers. Many young officers comment that transparent IAS induction gives confidence that performance, not patronage, will decide advancement. When that belief falters, motivation and morale follow.

In summary, Nagaland’s employee bodies are pressing for no less than full transparency in the induction of officers into the IAS. They say that the current approach has compromised merit, violated norms and damaged trust. They demand that the transparent IAS induction process be reinstated, procedures made public, and the state reaffirm its commitment to open competition. As the dispute continues, the effectiveness of the state’s administrative system hangs in the balance.

Read More: NCW Urges Joint Action by Mizoram Police and Assam Rifles to Curb Cross-Border Trafficking

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here